Skip to content
Discussion options

You must be logged in to vote
  • There's already a PR for Copilot #102, but Copilot is NOT yet on par with the other ACP providers; there are 2 blocker issues opened on their GitHub.

I would love to have a "Generic" Adapter! And I intend to work something like this soon.
But the reality is the ACP protocol and Schema are on what we can call v0.1, it's, most of the things are "optional" and there's no clear event order.

Which caused each ACP provider to implement it differently 🫠

Even Zed, the biggest driver on the ACP scene, created Claude-acp and Codex-acp implementations, and they both don't follow the same rules or send the same data. 😞

That's why we were forced to use 1 Adapter per provider.

Officially, as of the d…

Replies: 1 comment

Comment options

You must be logged in to vote
0 replies
Answer selected by brianhuster
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Category
Q&A
Labels
None yet
2 participants