Skip to content

Test with Juju 4 in CI #577

Description

@james-garner-canonical

We currently use the 3/stable channel for Juju in CI. We should test with Juju 4, either as well (since 3.6 is still LTS), or instead (to keep things simpler and faster).

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    infraIssues with the repository infrastructure specifically.team-charmlibs-maintainersMaintained by the canonical/charmlibs-maintainers team.

    Type

    Fields

    No fields configured for Task.

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions