The validation process is generating many warning messages in addition to actual "violations". While these warnings can be a useful tool to help implementers improve their data quality, these warning are also cluttering up the validation results and make it difficult to find actual violations.
Is it possible to make improvements to reporting the validation results in the prototype? E.g. grouping by violation first, then warning, then info?
Also need to think about messages (both in DCTAP and SHACL to contextualize Violations, Warnings, and Info)
The validation process is generating many warning messages in addition to actual "violations". While these warnings can be a useful tool to help implementers improve their data quality, these warning are also cluttering up the validation results and make it difficult to find actual violations.
Is it possible to make improvements to reporting the validation results in the prototype? E.g. grouping by violation first, then warning, then info?
Also need to think about messages (both in DCTAP and SHACL to contextualize Violations, Warnings, and Info)