@arleyc , thank you for making this package available.
I was finding this to be too slow for my purpose, so I went into the code and made it more efficient (as seen here). Based on a test here, it's about 19% faster and yields the same result. Would you be interested for me to initiate a pull request for this?
@arleyc , thank you for making this package available.
I was finding this to be too slow for my purpose, so I went into the code and made it more efficient (as seen here). Based on a test here, it's about 19% faster and yields the same result. Would you be interested for me to initiate a pull request for this?