Skip to content

RFC #661: glossary prioritization of new collections #949

Description

@GarthDB

Context

Open question from RFC #661 (Spectrum Design System Glossary), tracked in docs/rfc-coordination.md.

Beyond the current three registries (anatomy-terms, token-objects, categories), identify which new collections provide the most value next — e.g. a motion/animation terms registry, a color semantic terms registry, or a platform-adapter vocabulary. Prioritize based on which SPEC rules or authoring tooling most needs the additional vocabulary.

References

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    documentationImprovements or additions to documentation

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions