Skip to content

[Provider] Lower-cost DeepSeek/Kimi/GLM endpoint for testing #38

Description

@jasonwhite661

Hi Ali,

I noticed DeepClaude routes Claude Code to DeepSeek/OpenRouter and your README mentions the 17x cost comparison.

I'm testing a lower-cost China-model API supply (DeepSeek / Kimi / GLM / Qwen) via an Anthropic-compatible endpoint — same integration you already support.

Would you be open to trying it as an optional backend? I can provide free test credits and a side-by-side price/latency comparison vs OpenRouter/direct DeepSeek — no architecture change needed.

Two quick questions:

  1. Which backend do most of your users pick today?
  2. What would make a new provider worth adding to the README?

Thanks — happy to share results publicly if useful for the project.

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions