Skip to content

README suggestion: add a compatibility contract #13

Description

@nathan-widjaja

The 17x cheaper hook is doing its job — HN clearly found it. I think the next conversion blocker is trust, not awareness.

The README says the Claude Code tool loop, file edits, bash, git, subagents, and autonomous multi-step behavior stay intact while API calls route to DeepSeek/OpenRouter/compatible backends. That is the core promise, but I would make it a small compatibility contract before the install steps.

Example block:

Keep Claude Code's tool loop; swap only the model backend. What does not change: file editing, bash, git, subagents, and the autonomous loop. What changes: model behavior, provider limits, latency, credentials, and failure modes.

Then add two lines on when not to use it yet: sensitive repos, workflows that depend on exact Claude behavior, or teams that need a supported vendor path. The cost story stays sharp, but the project will feel safer to try.

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions