@jafors just pointed me to this workflow and your paper, @a-h-b. Very impressive workflow (and very cool logo!;).
He also remembered, that we recently had a lot of dada2 wrappers added to the snakemake wrappers (in case you haven't seen this project, yet, it's simply reusable and reproducible building blocks for snakemake workflows, including environment definitions and sometimes dedicated input/output handling). @cpauvert contributed those wrappers and even included dada2 meta-wrappers that chain together many of the individual wrappers in something of a subworkflow. From the discussions on these, I remembered he was also planning to create a workflow at some point. So maybe this could be a good fit to team up and use these wrappers in dadasnake?
And if you feel like even more standardisation and sharing with the workflow, have a look at the snakemake workflows project. That's intended as a growing library of standardized, easy-to-use snakemake worfklows, so dadasnake looks like a perfect fit.
@jafors just pointed me to this workflow and your paper, @a-h-b. Very impressive workflow (and very cool logo!;).
He also remembered, that we recently had a lot of dada2 wrappers added to the snakemake wrappers (in case you haven't seen this project, yet, it's simply reusable and reproducible building blocks for snakemake workflows, including environment definitions and sometimes dedicated input/output handling). @cpauvert contributed those wrappers and even included dada2 meta-wrappers that chain together many of the individual wrappers in something of a subworkflow. From the discussions on these, I remembered he was also planning to create a workflow at some point. So maybe this could be a good fit to team up and use these wrappers in dadasnake?
And if you feel like even more standardisation and sharing with the workflow, have a look at the snakemake workflows project. That's intended as a growing library of standardized, easy-to-use snakemake worfklows, so dadasnake looks like a perfect fit.