Skip to content

Lookahead should respect predefined scores even if the solution is suboptimal #30

Description

@stheid

len_pre = min(len(set(predef_features) & remaining_features), len_)
len_rest = len_ - len_pre
if strict and predef_features:
prefixes = [
[f_ for f_ in predef_features if f_ in remaining_features][:len_pre]
]
else:
prefixes = permutations(
set(predef_features) & remaining_features, len_pre
)

lookahead should not consider any additional features for selection untill the prefix is exausted.

maybe that is already the case, and maybe we need the lookahead regardless because we might need to lookahead when selecting the score for the current feature.

just needs to be checked, as it might save runtime

Activity

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions