Skip to content

Router False Positives #817

Description

@0xvanbeethoven

Type of MEV

atomic-arbitrage

Etherscan Links to Transactions

https://etherscan.io/tx/0x0fc42e1d7fc05c2ad9854c29bf0a338e2540d64fa09330f6870c9378c90a2899

Protocols Interacted With in the Bundle

  • 1 inch
  • Dodo

Were all protocols correctly supported?

  • Yes, all protocols were correctly supported.
  • No, there were issues with protocol support.

Details of Misclassification

  • Falsely classified as atomic arbitrage

Expected Correct Classification (Optional)

  • Not an arbitrage

Additional Context (Optional)

No response

Code of Conduct

  • I agree to follow the Code of Conduct.

Activity

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    S-needs-triageThis issue needs to be labelledmev-false-positiveTransactions that Brontes incorrectly classified as Mev

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions