Replies: 2 comments 2 replies
|
I think that would be great! I also tried to go down that path first by integrating Editor.js, but it proved tricky for a lot of reasons which I can go into later. Then I thought that at least having a nicer code editing experience would help a lot already even though it would only be useful to a subset of coders. And integrating Monaco proved to be way easier than trying to handle WYSIWYG non-destructively 😅 I think there was a discussion on Google Groups about this back then, I can try to find it later 👍 |
2 replies
|
Here's the whole Google Groups thread on a redesign of TiddlyWiki, which includes many of these ideas: https://groups.google.com/g/tiddlywiki/c/gX0o8j7Coa8/m/eMJBQKQrAwAJ |
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
A friend of mine (and author of TidGi, @linonetwo) is developing a WYSIWYG editor for TW based on SlateJS, and has already implemented some of the features, which look cool (here). I think that's enough for the average user.
However, I don't think Monaco's work is redundant. There is still a need for a tool that directly edits wikitext for more advanced features (like using wikitext a lot to write interesting features); also Monaco can be used to edit Markdown, JSON, or other content.
So I think TW5 will eventually produce a solution that best allows a tiddler to be edited WYSIWYG and also edit its wikitext in chunks (using Monaco) to achieve content that would be difficult to achieve with a WYSIWYG editor.
All reactions