Make explicit Roles for each Science Center

[kellijohnson-NOAA]

Right now, the website lists "Regional Representatives" under the "Roles" section. I would like to make this more specific for each science center and/or Implementation Team Member.

noaa-fims.github.io/contact/contributors.qmd

Lines 94 to 97 in c34df57

	### Regional Representatives
	Regional Representatives are expected to assist in FIMS implementation through design, development, and testing of FIMS. They also communicate FIMS progress and design to their respective regions and teammates. Representatives serve as power users who provide basic training and outreach within their centers on transitioning to FIMS. These representatives are also responsible for relaying feedback, questions, and training requests that they cannot complete back to the Project Lead. Regional representatives are expected to introduce their partner fishery management organizations to FIMS to assist transition of FIMS from research to operations.

This could list platforms that Science Centers are bridging from when they transition to FIMS, e.g., the SEFSC will provide support for transitioning from BAM to FIMS. Additionally, I feel like each science center has expertise in certain areas, such as the NEFSC has the expertise in random effects, etc. By the end of June, can each set of Regional Representatives work together to create a statement specific to their Science Center and/or their own personal expertise regarding what their Role is. Feel free to break off from the Science Center model as well and just propose Titles such as "Liasson to Beaufort Assessment Model" or other such titles. Please post your descriptions in this issue and then we will make a PR. The other Roles are being updated in #109.

I could only assign up to 10 people so I chose to assign one Regional Representative per Science Center and then I am tagging additional individuals here
@peterkuriyama-NOAA @MOshima-PIFSC @dgoethel-noaa @timjmiller @erikhwilliams @ericward-noaa

[iantaylor-NOAA]

Here's a proposal from NWFSC: "The Northwest Fisheries Science Center Representatives are contributing expertise with Stock Synthesis and modeling growth as well as helping develop tools to generate priors for models, explore model results, and run model diagnostics."
@kellijohnson-NOAA, feel free to edit as you wish. It makes more sense to me to have this be a description of what @ericward-noaa and I are currently involved in, so we can revisit as needed as our work evolves.

[erikhwilliams]

My proposal, edit as you see fit:
The Southeast Fisheries Science Center will provide support for transitioning from the Beaufort Assessment Model (BAM) to FIMS. @erikhwilliams will serve as the liaison to the BAM model and its transition to FIMS. Users supporting this transition include @erikhwilliams, @Nikolai-Klibansky, and @mtvincent-NOAA.

[emilyliljestrand]

The Northeast Fisheries Science Center contribute expertise from the Woods Hole Assessment Model (WHAM) whose key features include spatial dynamics, random effects, and environmental covariates on catch-at-age models with multiple abundance indices. Scientists supporting this work are @emilyliljestrand and @timjmiller

As with others, please edit as you see fit