The repo has no LICENSE file, which means it defaults to full copyright — no one else can legally reuse, fork-and-redistribute, or build on this code (even though it's public on GitHub and open for stars/forks/PRs).
Given the tech stack (sherpa-onnx, ONNX Runtime, NLLB-200, Jetpack Compose, Hilt — all permissively licensed), a permissive license like MIT or Apache-2.0 would match the spirit of the project and let others actually build on the work, not just look at it.
Would you consider adding one? Happy to open a PR with a LICENSE file (MIT by default) if you tell me which you'd prefer, or you can just add it yourself via GitHub's "Add file" license template picker.
(Context: I was evaluating this project as a translation backend for a small offline speech app I'm building, and the missing license is the one thing blocking me from actually using it as a base rather than just reading it for inspiration.)
The repo has no
LICENSEfile, which means it defaults to full copyright — no one else can legally reuse, fork-and-redistribute, or build on this code (even though it's public on GitHub and open for stars/forks/PRs).Given the tech stack (sherpa-onnx, ONNX Runtime, NLLB-200, Jetpack Compose, Hilt — all permissively licensed), a permissive license like MIT or Apache-2.0 would match the spirit of the project and let others actually build on the work, not just look at it.
Would you consider adding one? Happy to open a PR with a LICENSE file (MIT by default) if you tell me which you'd prefer, or you can just add it yourself via GitHub's "Add file" license template picker.
(Context: I was evaluating this project as a translation backend for a small offline speech app I'm building, and the missing license is the one thing blocking me from actually using it as a base rather than just reading it for inspiration.)