Skip to content

Separation between description and registration information #27

@kitchenprinzessin3880

Description

@kitchenprinzessin3880

simon cox: I’m a bit concerned that the information about the sample is mixed together with information about its registration status. My take is that it should be partitioned in at least two:

Registration – i.e. information about the registration record, significant in the context of IGSN only:

  • Identifier
  • Registrant
  • isMetadataPublic

Sample description:

  • alternateIdentifiers
  • relatedResourceIdentifiers
  • description
  • resourceTypes
  • materials
  • locations
  • collectionMethods
  • collectors
  • contributors

These ones I can’t tell:

  • date (which date? Sample creation, registration …)

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Type

    No type
    No fields configured for issues without a type.

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions