@FeijiangHan
I set up an online entry point for PaperForge. Readers upload a PDF or paste an arXiv link and get the full 12-section analysis without copying SKILL_CHN.md or configuring a project.
The "reconstruct the author's thought process" section (§ 3) is the strongest design choice here. Most paper-reading prompts skip straight to method explanation, but rebuilding the reasoning path before showing the method changes how a reader actually engages with the paper. That step is hard to appreciate from a README alone; it lands when someone actually runs it on their own paper.
You can try the paper reading flow here. Forward the link to lab mates or Bilibili viewers and they can use it directly.
Every session leaves a usage record you can review — useful for seeing which papers people actually bring, how deep they go, and where to sharpen examples.
shesonglin@tinkerland.ai — feel free to close if this isn't relevant.
@FeijiangHan
I set up an online entry point for PaperForge. Readers upload a PDF or paste an arXiv link and get the full 12-section analysis without copying SKILL_CHN.md or configuring a project.
The "reconstruct the author's thought process" section (§ 3) is the strongest design choice here. Most paper-reading prompts skip straight to method explanation, but rebuilding the reasoning path before showing the method changes how a reader actually engages with the paper. That step is hard to appreciate from a README alone; it lands when someone actually runs it on their own paper.
You can try the paper reading flow here. Forward the link to lab mates or Bilibili viewers and they can use it directly.
Every session leaves a usage record you can review — useful for seeing which papers people actually bring, how deep they go, and where to sharpen examples.
shesonglin@tinkerland.ai — feel free to close if this isn't relevant.