Naming question from a community project built on your editors

[delmarguillen]

Hi, I maintain Euro-Office Lite (the project from #40), a lightweight desktop app built on your editors.

It is starting to get organic users, a third party packaged it for the AUR, and I am looking into wider distribution through Flathub. Before that I want to make sure the name is not a problem for you. I picked "Euro-Office Lite" to be honest about what it builds on, but I am aware the license covers the code and not the brand, and I do not want to imply the project is official in any way.

Two questions:

1. Is the current name acceptable to you, with a clear unofficial/not-affiliated note in the README?
2. If you would rather I rename the project, that is completely fine. It is young enough that renaming is still cheap, so a short "please rename" is all I need.

If you have naming or trademark guidelines for community projects I am happy to just follow those. Thanks for the editors, no rush on this.

[x0123456789]

Hey!
I am not a dev, just a casual user. I think it will be much more convenient for you to change the name of the fork, because people can easily confuse it with vanilla EuroOffice (think that you/your project have an affiliation with the EuroOffice dev team - thanks to a person below for specifying it ;)). Obviously, the question depends on how long you plan to develop your fork.
Something like "eOffice Lite", "LiteOffice" could fit in nicely.
Your project looks really promising and I hope you will continue to work on it. Good luck!

[pplupo]

I'm also a user, I've been contributing to the project, but I HAVE NO AUTHORITY TO ANSWER YOUR INQUIRY,

With that being very clear, I love that you are doing this, and I hope you can keep the name. The name makes very, very clear to whoever sees it what the project is. Unfortunately, it doesn't make it clear that it's unaffiliated. I hope the disclaimers are enough or that people grant your project official status (affiliated).