Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
125 lines (84 loc) · 2.66 KB

File metadata and controls

125 lines (84 loc) · 2.66 KB

Summary

Describe the problem and fix in 2–5 bullets:

  • Problem:
  • Why it matters:
  • What changed:
  • What did NOT change (scope boundary):

Change Type (select all)

  • Bug fix
  • Feature
  • Refactor
  • Docs
  • Security hardening
  • Chore/infra

Scope (select all touched areas)

  • Core (schemas/resolver/composer/validator)
  • CLI
  • API
  • Web UI
  • Mission Control
  • Docker/Infrastructure
  • Tests
  • Documentation

Linked Issue/PR

  • Closes #
  • Related #

User-visible / Behavior Changes

List user-visible changes (including defaults/config). If none, write None.

Security Impact (required)

  • New permissions/capabilities? (Yes/No)
  • Secrets/tokens handling changed? (Yes/No)
  • New/changed network calls? (Yes/No)
  • Command/tool execution surface changed? (Yes/No)
  • Data access scope changed? (Yes/No)
  • If any Yes, explain risk + mitigation:

Repro + Verification

Environment

  • OS:
  • Runtime/container:
  • Relevant config (redacted):

Steps

Expected

Actual

Evidence

Attach at least one:

  • Failing test/log before + passing after
  • Trace/log snippets
  • Screenshot/recording
  • Perf numbers (if relevant)

Human Verification (required)

What you personally verified (not just CI), and how:

  • Verified scenarios:
  • Edge cases checked:
  • What you did not verify:

Review Conversations

  • I replied to or resolved every bot review conversation I addressed in this PR.
  • I left unresolved only the conversations that still need reviewer or maintainer judgment.

If a bot review conversation is addressed by this PR, resolve that conversation yourself. Do not leave bot review conversation cleanup for maintainers.

Compatibility / Migration

  • Backward compatible? (Yes/No)
  • Config/env changes? (Yes/No)
  • Migration needed? (Yes/No)
  • If yes, exact upgrade steps:

Failure Recovery (if this breaks)

  • How to disable/revert this change quickly:
  • Files/config to restore:
  • Known bad symptoms reviewers should watch for:

Risks and Mitigations

List only real risks for this PR. Add/remove entries as needed. If none, write None.

  • Risk:
    • Mitigation:

AI-Assisted Development (if applicable)

If this PR was built with AI assistance (Codex, Claude, etc.):

  • Marked as AI-assisted in PR title/description
  • Noted degree of testing (untested / lightly tested / fully tested)
  • Included prompts or session logs (if possible)
  • Confirmed understanding of what the code does
  • Resolved/replied to bot review conversations after addressing them

AI PRs are welcome! We just want transparency so reviewers know what to look for.