Skip to content

Composition idea once this goes paid: an optional pre-spend check for bulk-pull decisions #1

Description

@babyblueviper1

Real fit worth naming, not a build request. Your per-record pricing already deters casual bulk scraping structurally (capped search results, full-detail priced separately) -- the harder case is an AGENT deciding whether a specific multi-call pull (e.g. "get full detail on all 40 search hits for topic X") is actually worth the aggregate spend before it starts.

We run /review (api.babyblueviper.com) -- an independent, signed pre-action verdict (approve / approve_with_concerns / reject + confidence) from a party with zero access to the calling agent's own reasoning, checkable by anyone after the fact (/verify-proof, no auth). The natural composition: before an agent's MCP client fires N paid get_pr_bill calls in a loop, it could pass the plan (call count, aggregate USDC cost, the actual task) through /review first -- catches the "agent about to burn pulling bills it doesn't need" case your pricing structure doesn't itself prevent (it deters scraping, not a legitimately-authorized-but-wasteful agent).

Purely a note for when this moves off scaffold status -- your x402 payment isolation (src/server/x402.ts) already keeps the seller side clean, this would live entirely on the caller/agent side, nothing for you to build. Happy to compare notes on the wire shape if it's ever useful.

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions