This BenPru/luxtronik integration relies on the python-luxtronik library.
Correct definition of new luxtronik parameters, calculations should preferably be done in that library, otherwise can we need to apply more and more band-aids in this integration for get things working.
Related to some discovery problems I also noted several screenshots showing 'None' as the Heatpump manufacturer and Model, possibly/likely because the existing python-luxtronik library does not yet 'know' these new heatpump types.
BenPru asked for a (bigger) update about 2 years ago, Bouni/python-luxtronik#136 , but development came to a halt last year. :-(
I have now asked if it would be possible for that library to release a small update, and this may be an option.... :-)
We should therefore check if the current development version Bouni/luxtronik-python@main doesn't break the current integration.
I am setting up a branch https://github.com/BenPru/luxtronik/tree/test_compatibility_with_main_python-luxtronik we can use to test this.
This BenPru/luxtronik integration relies on the python-luxtronik library.
Correct definition of new luxtronik parameters, calculations should preferably be done in that library, otherwise can we need to apply more and more band-aids in this integration for get things working.
Related to some discovery problems I also noted several screenshots showing 'None' as the Heatpump manufacturer and Model, possibly/likely because the existing python-luxtronik library does not yet 'know' these new heatpump types.
BenPru asked for a (bigger) update about 2 years ago, Bouni/python-luxtronik#136 , but development came to a halt last year. :-(
I have now asked if it would be possible for that library to release a small update, and this may be an option.... :-)
We should therefore check if the current development version Bouni/luxtronik-python@main doesn't break the current integration.
I am setting up a branch https://github.com/BenPru/luxtronik/tree/test_compatibility_with_main_python-luxtronik we can use to test this.