Replies: 1 comment 1 reply
|
Thanks for bringing this up! This is indeed does not look like the expected behavior.
|
1 reply
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Hi WarpX team,
I have a general question related to the partial mesh refinements in WarpX. I am running electrostatic simulations with kind of complex STL embedded boundaries. So far I am using a uniform 3D cartesian grid for this and now I am trying to include a (static) refined region into my model domain, which does not intersect with any EmbeddedBoundary and whose spatial resolution should be two times FINER than the base grid.
When setting this up as a refined region, the Multigrid solver for some reason starts to coarsen my EmbeddedBoundaries and errors out on that because the EBs are borderline resolvable with my level 0 grid discretization. I am now wondering why the Solver is trying to coarsen my base grid in the first place, when I am actually trying to add a finer layer? Can I somehow avoid/deactivate this and if not: can I perhaps go the inverse route of defining my base grid with the finer resolution and then partially coarsen regions within it?
Cheers,
Alex
All reactions