Backlog ID: ISSUE-KMP-100 | Epic: EPIC-04 | Complexity: Small
Description
ISSUE-KMP-100 is a Low severity / P2 priority Architecture issue in @kampyn-backend, under Invoices / Algorithms.
Problem overview
This work item asks the team to: Optimize InvoiceUtils Async map Over Items.
Today the system behaves as follows: Async map without clear concurrency control.
That is incorrect or insufficient for a production multi-tenant platform. After this issue is fixed, the expected outcome is: Batched processing with concurrency limits.
Why this issue exists
Avoid request spikes to DB/remote.
If this remains unresolved, realistic consequences include: Burst load.
This finding is grounded in the technical audit: Audit N+1 invoiceUtils.js:40.
Implementation scope
Concrete touchpoints are listed later in this issue (1 file path(s) and 1 API/function touchpoint(s)). Use those lists during implementation and code review so nothing in scope is missed.
Recommended direction (outcome-focused, not a mandatory design): p-limit style concurrency; batch DB.
Planning
- Estimated complexity: Small
- Priority rationale: Moderate algorithmic cleanup.
- Depends on:
Do not treat this issue as independently shippable until listed dependencies are addressed or explicitly waived.
Definition of done
Close this issue only when every Acceptance Criteria checkbox is complete and the Testing Requirements have been run (or waived with written rationale on the PR). The title states the change; this description, the expected behavior, and the acceptance criteria together define success.
Current Behavior
Async map without clear concurrency control.
Expected Behavior
Batched processing with concurrency limits.
Why This Matters
Avoid request spikes to DB/remote.
Evidence From Audit
Audit N+1 invoiceUtils.js:40.
Risk / Impact
Burst load.
Recommended Direction
p-limit style concurrency; batch DB.
Acceptance Criteria
Testing Requirements
Dependencies
Affected Files
kampyn-backend/utils/invoiceUtils.js
Affected Functions / APIs
Invoice generation helpers
Created from KAMPYN_GITHUB_ISSUES.md
Description
ISSUE-KMP-100 is a Low severity / P2 priority Architecture issue in @kampyn-backend, under Invoices / Algorithms.
Problem overview
This work item asks the team to: Optimize InvoiceUtils Async map Over Items.
Today the system behaves as follows: Async map without clear concurrency control.
That is incorrect or insufficient for a production multi-tenant platform. After this issue is fixed, the expected outcome is: Batched processing with concurrency limits.
Why this issue exists
Avoid request spikes to DB/remote.
If this remains unresolved, realistic consequences include: Burst load.
This finding is grounded in the technical audit: Audit N+1 invoiceUtils.js:40.
Implementation scope
Concrete touchpoints are listed later in this issue (1 file path(s) and 1 API/function touchpoint(s)). Use those lists during implementation and code review so nothing in scope is missed.
Recommended direction (outcome-focused, not a mandatory design): p-limit style concurrency; batch DB.
Planning
Do not treat this issue as independently shippable until listed dependencies are addressed or explicitly waived.
Definition of done
Close this issue only when every Acceptance Criteria checkbox is complete and the Testing Requirements have been run (or waived with written rationale on the PR). The title states the change; this description, the expected behavior, and the acceptance criteria together define success.
Current Behavior
Async map without clear concurrency control.
Expected Behavior
Batched processing with concurrency limits.
Why This Matters
Avoid request spikes to DB/remote.
Evidence From Audit
Audit N+1 invoiceUtils.js:40.
Risk / Impact
Burst load.
Recommended Direction
p-limit style concurrency; batch DB.
Acceptance Criteria
Testing Requirements
Dependencies
Affected Files
kampyn-backend/utils/invoiceUtils.jsAffected Functions / APIs
Invoice generation helpersCreated from KAMPYN_GITHUB_ISSUES.md