Goal
Make DSHelm legible as a community project rather than a repository whose roadmap is visible only through maintainer commits.
Work
- expose a small set of bounded contribution areas: provider/model evidence, platform verification, documentation, routing examples, and reproducible bugs;
- document what evidence is required before changing model capability metadata or compatibility claims;
- add/refresh contribution guidance for install reports and route traces with privacy redaction rules;
- point public DSH interface questions back to the relevant upstream Discussion rather than maintaining a parallel undocumented contract;
- collect the first external install reports and link them from this issue.
Success criteria
The community-roadmap target is at least three non-maintainer issues and two reusable user cases over time. This issue should remain focused on building the entry path and evidence quality; raw star count is not an acceptance criterion.
Goal
Make DSHelm legible as a community project rather than a repository whose roadmap is visible only through maintainer commits.
Work
Success criteria
The community-roadmap target is at least three non-maintainer issues and two reusable user cases over time. This issue should remain focused on building the entry path and evidence quality; raw star count is not an acceptance criterion.