Skip to content

Check back at the current status of spatial methods #958

@sjspielman

Description

@sjspielman

I think it's good to be transparent about this, but we are going to get a lot of questions about why we are normalizing if this is the case, so we should be prepared to answer those...

Originally posted by @allyhawkins in #957 (comment)


I'm opening this issue as a way future reminder for when we get closer to teaching the first spatial workshop. This issue tracks taking some time to make sure we're up to date on any big/relevant development in spatial methods, in particular normalization, that we need to be aware of when teaching.

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

Labels

No labels
No labels

Type

No type
No fields configured for issues without a type.

Projects

No projects

Milestone

No milestone

Relationships

None yet

Development

No branches or pull requests

Issue actions