|
| 1 | +(howto-implements-instantiates)= |
| 2 | +# Implements vs Instantiates vs Inheritance: A Best Practices Guide |
| 3 | + |
| 4 | +LinkML offers several mechanisms for relating schema elements to one another: |
| 5 | +**`is_a` + `mixins`** (inheritance), **`implements`** (structural conformance), |
| 6 | +and **`instantiates`** (metamodel extension). This guide clarifies when and why |
| 7 | +to use each one. |
| 8 | + |
| 9 | +## Quick Reference |
| 10 | + |
| 11 | +| Mechanism | Relationship | Analogy | What it governs | |
| 12 | +|-----------|-------------|---------|-----------------| |
| 13 | +| `is_a` | "is a kind of" | Class inheritance (OOP) | Slot inheritance, type hierarchy | |
| 14 | +| `mixins` | "also behaves like" | Traits / interfaces (OOP) | Slot inheritance without single-parent constraint | |
| 15 | +| `implements` | "conforms to the structure of" | Interface implementation | Declares structural conformance to a template | |
| 16 | +| `instantiates` | "is an instance of (at the meta level)" | Metaclass instantiation | Governs which annotations are valid on a schema element | |
| 17 | + |
| 18 | +## `is_a` and `mixins` — Classical Inheritance |
| 19 | + |
| 20 | +Use `is_a` and `mixins` when your classes form a genuine **type hierarchy** — |
| 21 | +where a child class truly *is a kind of* the parent. |
| 22 | + |
| 23 | +```yaml |
| 24 | +classes: |
| 25 | + NamedThing: |
| 26 | + abstract: true |
| 27 | + slots: |
| 28 | + - id |
| 29 | + - name |
| 30 | + |
| 31 | + WithProvenance: |
| 32 | + mixin: true |
| 33 | + slots: |
| 34 | + - created_by |
| 35 | + - created_on |
| 36 | + |
| 37 | + Person: |
| 38 | + is_a: NamedThing |
| 39 | + mixins: |
| 40 | + - WithProvenance |
| 41 | + slots: |
| 42 | + - birth_date |
| 43 | +``` |
| 44 | +
|
| 45 | +Key properties: |
| 46 | +
|
| 47 | +- **`is_a` forms a tree** — each class has at most one `is_a` parent. |
| 48 | +- **`mixins` form a DAG** — a class can mix in multiple mixin classes, avoiding |
| 49 | + the [diamond problem](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mixin). |
| 50 | +- **Slots are inherited.** `Person` above inherits `id`, `name`, `created_by`, |
| 51 | + and `created_on` without redeclaring them. |
| 52 | +- **`slot_usage` refines inherited slots** in the context of the child class |
| 53 | + (e.g. making an inherited slot required). |
| 54 | + |
| 55 | +**When to use:** You are modeling a domain ontology where child classes are |
| 56 | +genuinely subtypes of parent classes. Data validated against the child class |
| 57 | +should also be valid against the parent class (Liskov substitution). |
| 58 | + |
| 59 | +## `implements` — Structural Conformance |
| 60 | + |
| 61 | +Use `implements` when a class **conforms to a structural template** without |
| 62 | +being a subtype of it. Think of it like implementing an interface or satisfying |
| 63 | +a contract. |
| 64 | + |
| 65 | +```yaml |
| 66 | +classes: |
| 67 | + FieldObservation: |
| 68 | + description: >- |
| 69 | + Contract for field observation classes. |
| 70 | + Any class that implements this must provide these slots. |
| 71 | + slots: |
| 72 | + - location |
| 73 | + - timestamp |
| 74 | + - observer |
| 75 | +
|
| 76 | + RadonObservation: |
| 77 | + implements: |
| 78 | + - geochem_profile:FieldObservation |
| 79 | + slots: |
| 80 | + - location |
| 81 | + - timestamp |
| 82 | + - observer |
| 83 | + - radon_activity |
| 84 | +``` |
| 85 | + |
| 86 | +Key properties: |
| 87 | + |
| 88 | +- **No slot inheritance.** Unlike `is_a`, `implements` does not automatically |
| 89 | + pull slots into the implementing class. You must declare them yourself. |
| 90 | +- **Cross-schema references.** The value of `implements` is a `uriorcurie`, |
| 91 | + so you can reference classes from external schemas without importing them. |
| 92 | +- **Documentative intent.** `implements` declares that your class is *intended* |
| 93 | + to conform to a contract. Tooling support for enforcement is evolving. |
| 94 | + |
| 95 | +**When to use:** You want to declare that your class or slot satisfies a |
| 96 | +structural contract defined elsewhere, but it is *not* a subtype of that |
| 97 | +contract class. This is especially useful when: |
| 98 | + |
| 99 | +- The contract comes from an external schema you do not want to import wholesale. |
| 100 | +- Your class belongs to a different type hierarchy but must meet certain |
| 101 | + structural requirements. |
| 102 | +- You are working with schema profiles (see [Schema Profiles](#schema-profiles) |
| 103 | + below). |
| 104 | +- A slot implements a well-known semantic property (see below). |
| 105 | + |
| 106 | +### `implements` for Semantic Properties |
| 107 | + |
| 108 | +`implements` can also be used at the **slot level** to declare that a slot |
| 109 | +represents a well-known semantic property. For example, to declare that a |
| 110 | +`name` attribute implements `rdfs:label`: |
| 111 | + |
| 112 | +```yaml |
| 113 | +classes: |
| 114 | + OntologyTerm: |
| 115 | + attributes: |
| 116 | + id: |
| 117 | + identifier: true |
| 118 | + name: |
| 119 | + implements: |
| 120 | + - rdfs:label |
| 121 | +``` |
| 122 | + |
| 123 | +This is the recommended approach for binding validation in the |
| 124 | +[linkml-term-validator](https://linkml.io/linkml-term-validator/binding-validation/#1-using-implements-recommended), |
| 125 | +where it signals which field holds the canonical label for ontology term |
| 126 | +lookups. |
| 127 | + |
| 128 | +## `instantiates` — Metamodel Extension |
| 129 | + |
| 130 | +Use `instantiates` when a schema element **is an instance of a metaclass** that |
| 131 | +governs what *annotations* (metadata about the schema element itself) are valid. |
| 132 | +This operates at the *meta* level — it does not affect the data instances, but |
| 133 | +rather the schema element's own metadata. |
| 134 | + |
| 135 | +```yaml |
| 136 | +classes: |
| 137 | + RadonObservation: |
| 138 | + instantiates: |
| 139 | + - geochem_profile:GeochemClass |
| 140 | + annotations: |
| 141 | + provenance_status: "validated" # governed by GeochemClass |
| 142 | + data_steward: "smoxon" # governed by GeochemClass |
| 143 | + slots: |
| 144 | + - radon_activity |
| 145 | +``` |
| 146 | + |
| 147 | +Where `GeochemClass` is defined as: |
| 148 | + |
| 149 | +```yaml |
| 150 | +# In geochem_profile schema |
| 151 | +classes: |
| 152 | + GeochemClass: |
| 153 | + description: "Any class in a geochem schema must have provenance" |
| 154 | + class_uri: geochem_profile:GeochemClass |
| 155 | + attributes: |
| 156 | + provenance_status: |
| 157 | + range: string |
| 158 | + required: true |
| 159 | + data_steward: |
| 160 | + range: string |
| 161 | +``` |
| 162 | + |
| 163 | +Key properties: |
| 164 | + |
| 165 | +- **Governs annotations, not data slots.** `instantiates` controls which |
| 166 | + annotation tags are valid on the schema element. |
| 167 | +- **Metaclass relationship.** The instantiated class acts as a metaclass — its |
| 168 | + slots define the valid annotation keys for the instantiating element. |
| 169 | +- **Works on any schema element.** Classes, slots, enums, and even schemas |
| 170 | + themselves can use `instantiates`. |
| 171 | +- **Validation is declarative.** As of LinkML 1.6+, `instantiates` declares |
| 172 | + intent. Full validation enforcement is under active development. |
| 173 | + |
| 174 | +**When to use:** You want to constrain or extend the *metadata* that schema |
| 175 | +authors must provide on their schema elements (not the data those elements |
| 176 | +describe). |
| 177 | + |
| 178 | +## Putting It All Together |
| 179 | + |
| 180 | +Here is a complete example showing all three mechanisms working in concert, |
| 181 | +adapted from a geochemistry schema profile: |
| 182 | + |
| 183 | +```yaml |
| 184 | +# geochem_profile.yaml — defines rules for geochem schemas |
| 185 | +
|
| 186 | +id: https://example.org/geochem-profile/ |
| 187 | +name: geochem_profile |
| 188 | +prefixes: |
| 189 | + geochem_profile: https://example.org/geochem-profile/ |
| 190 | + linkml: https://w3id.org/linkml/ |
| 191 | +
|
| 192 | +classes: |
| 193 | + # Metaclass: governs annotations on classes |
| 194 | + GeochemClass: |
| 195 | + description: "Any class in a geochem schema must have provenance metadata" |
| 196 | + class_uri: geochem_profile:GeochemClass |
| 197 | + attributes: |
| 198 | + provenance_status: |
| 199 | + range: string |
| 200 | + required: true |
| 201 | + data_steward: |
| 202 | + range: string |
| 203 | +
|
| 204 | + # Metaclass: governs annotations on slots |
| 205 | + GeochemSlot: |
| 206 | + description: "Any slot in a geochem schema must declare units" |
| 207 | + class_uri: geochem_profile:GeochemSlot |
| 208 | + attributes: |
| 209 | + unit_ontology_term: |
| 210 | + range: uriorcurie |
| 211 | +
|
| 212 | + # Structural contract: defines required slots for field observations |
| 213 | + FieldObservation: |
| 214 | + description: "Contract for field observation classes" |
| 215 | + slots: |
| 216 | + - location |
| 217 | + - timestamp |
| 218 | + - observer |
| 219 | +``` |
| 220 | + |
| 221 | +Then in a downstream schema: |
| 222 | + |
| 223 | +```yaml |
| 224 | +# radon_schema.yaml — a domain schema that uses the profile |
| 225 | +
|
| 226 | +id: https://example.org/radon/ |
| 227 | +name: radon_schema |
| 228 | +prefixes: |
| 229 | + geochem_profile: https://example.org/geochem-profile/ |
| 230 | +
|
| 231 | +classes: |
| 232 | + RadonObservation: |
| 233 | + # META-LEVEL: "I am an instance of your metaclass" |
| 234 | + # → governs which annotations are valid on this class |
| 235 | + instantiates: |
| 236 | + - geochem_profile:GeochemClass |
| 237 | +
|
| 238 | + # STRUCTURAL: "I conform to your structural contract" |
| 239 | + # → declares that this class provides the slots required by FieldObservation |
| 240 | + implements: |
| 241 | + - geochem_profile:FieldObservation |
| 242 | +
|
| 243 | + # Annotations governed by instantiates (GeochemClass attributes) |
| 244 | + annotations: |
| 245 | + provenance_status: "validated" |
| 246 | + data_steward: "smoxon" |
| 247 | +
|
| 248 | + # Data slots — some from implements contract, some domain-specific |
| 249 | + slots: |
| 250 | + - location # ← required by FieldObservation contract |
| 251 | + - timestamp # ← required by FieldObservation contract |
| 252 | + - observer # ← required by FieldObservation contract |
| 253 | + - radon_activity # ← domain-specific |
| 254 | +
|
| 255 | +slots: |
| 256 | + radon_activity: |
| 257 | + # META-LEVEL: "I am an instance of your slot metaclass" |
| 258 | + instantiates: |
| 259 | + - geochem_profile:GeochemSlot |
| 260 | + annotations: |
| 261 | + unit_ontology_term: "UO:0000134" # governed by GeochemSlot |
| 262 | + range: float |
| 263 | +
|
| 264 | + location: |
| 265 | + range: string |
| 266 | + timestamp: |
| 267 | + range: datetime |
| 268 | + observer: |
| 269 | + range: string |
| 270 | +``` |
| 271 | + |
| 272 | +Notice how: |
| 273 | + |
| 274 | +- **`instantiates`** operates at the meta level, governing annotations |
| 275 | + (`provenance_status`, `data_steward`, `unit_ontology_term`). |
| 276 | +- **`implements`** operates at the structural level, declaring conformance to |
| 277 | + a slot contract (`location`, `timestamp`, `observer`). |
| 278 | +- Neither `instantiates` nor `implements` *inherits* slots — that is the job |
| 279 | + of `is_a` and `mixins`. |
| 280 | + |
| 281 | +## Decision Flowchart |
| 282 | + |
| 283 | +When deciding which mechanism to use, ask yourself: |
| 284 | + |
| 285 | +1. **Is the child a genuine subtype of the parent?** |
| 286 | + → Use `is_a` (and `mixins` for cross-cutting concerns). |
| 287 | + |
| 288 | +2. **Does the class need to satisfy a structural contract from another schema?** |
| 289 | + → Use `implements`. |
| 290 | + |
| 291 | +3. **Do I need to govern what metadata (annotations) schema authors can attach |
| 292 | + to a schema element?** |
| 293 | + → Use `instantiates`. |
| 294 | + |
| 295 | +4. **Do I need more than one?** |
| 296 | + → Yes! These mechanisms are complementary. A single class can use `is_a`, |
| 297 | + `mixins`, `implements`, and `instantiates` simultaneously. |
| 298 | + |
| 299 | +(schema-profiles)= |
| 300 | +## Schema Profiles |
| 301 | + |
| 302 | +The `implements` and `instantiates` mechanisms are foundational to the concept |
| 303 | +of **schema profiles** — reusable sets of constraints and conventions that |
| 304 | +downstream schemas can adopt. |
| 305 | + |
| 306 | +The [linkml-microschema-profile](https://github.com/linkml/linkml-microschema-profile) |
| 307 | +project provides an example of this pattern. It defines a small, generic profile |
| 308 | +that schema authors can reference to ensure their schemas follow common |
| 309 | +conventions (e.g. requiring descriptions on all classes, enforcing naming |
| 310 | +patterns). |
| 311 | + |
| 312 | +Profiles are useful when: |
| 313 | + |
| 314 | +- An organization wants to enforce governance rules across many schemas without |
| 315 | + requiring full schema imports. |
| 316 | +- Domain-specific conventions (like the geochemistry example above) need to be |
| 317 | + separated from generic best practices. |
| 318 | +- You want to layer constraints: a generic profile for all schemas, plus a |
| 319 | + domain profile for your specific field. |
| 320 | + |
| 321 | +For instance, generic constraints like "all classes must have descriptions" |
| 322 | +belong in a base profile, while domain-specific metaclasses like |
| 323 | +`GeochemClass` belong in a domain-specific child profile. See |
| 324 | +[issue #3282](https://github.com/linkml/linkml/issues/3282) for discussion on |
| 325 | +separating generic from domain-specific profile components. |
| 326 | + |
| 327 | +## Common Pitfalls |
| 328 | + |
| 329 | +**Pitfall 1: Using `is_a` when you mean `implements`.** |
| 330 | +If your class is not genuinely a subtype — it just happens to share some |
| 331 | +slots — prefer `implements`. Misusing `is_a` creates misleading type |
| 332 | +hierarchies. |
| 333 | + |
| 334 | +**Pitfall 2: Expecting slot inheritance from `implements`.** |
| 335 | +Unlike `is_a`, `implements` does not pull in slots. You must declare the |
| 336 | +required slots explicitly in your class. |
| 337 | + |
| 338 | +**Pitfall 3: Confusing `instantiates` with `implements`.** |
| 339 | +`instantiates` governs *annotations on the schema element itself* (metadata |
| 340 | +about the class/slot). `implements` governs *the structure of data instances* |
| 341 | +(which slots the class provides). They operate at different levels. |
| 342 | + |
| 343 | +**Pitfall 4: Using `instantiates` to try to add data slots.** |
| 344 | +`instantiates` controls annotation validity, not data structure. If you need |
| 345 | +to add data slots, use `is_a`, `mixins`, or declare them directly. |
| 346 | + |
| 347 | +## Summary |
| 348 | + |
| 349 | +| Question | Use | |
| 350 | +|----------|-----| |
| 351 | +| "Is RadonObservation a kind of Observation?" | `is_a: Observation` | |
| 352 | +| "Should RadonObservation also behave like a Locatable thing?" | `mixins: [Locatable]` | |
| 353 | +| "Does RadonObservation conform to the FieldObservation contract?" | `implements: [geochem_profile:FieldObservation]` | |
| 354 | +| "What metadata must the RadonObservation *class definition* carry?" | `instantiates: [geochem_profile:GeochemClass]` | |
0 commit comments