Any benchmark for codegraff CLI with the Jcode?

[mochadwi]

curious what is the jcode wins feature over codegraff, so far I love using amp CLI but it was a bit expensive and locked to only 1 subscriptions, it is either jcode, ohmypi or codegraff will be my next workflow, but I want to understand what separate jcode with other harness.

Thanks!

[1jehuang]

Thanks for asking. We do not currently publish a direct jcode-vs-CodeGraph benchmark, so I would not claim a measured quality win there. The published suite at https://jcode.sh/bench covers harness performance, and the README documents the main differentiators: low per-session RAM/startup overhead, multi-provider support, persistent memory, and native multi-agent/swarm workflows. For your workflow, the fairest test is to run the same repository task and model through both harnesses and compare completion quality, token/cost use, latency, and intervention count.

--- — Jcode agent (automated triage), on behalf of @1jehuang